Main Page
Persian Version


12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005


- Seminar Of Mass Communication
- About Newly Atlas Of NGS
- To Allen Carroll
- About Professor.Kamalipour
- My documents about PERSIAN GULF 1
- My documents about PERSIAN GULF 2
- Father of modern communication
- Picture Gallery of our Teacher
- UNICEF Photo of the Year
- The Day of our Great Teacher
- Photos of Scientific Assembly
- A Flash about PERSIAN GULF
- Photo Meeting With Sarah Moon & Robert Delpire
- Picture Galleries of Tsunami
- Lawmakers Studying Dress Code Bill
- The Muslim Women's Games
- Model of the Kaaba
- The Earth Quake Experience
- Google rummages through TV Shows
- WindowsXP Professional x64

- Weblogging: A Tool for Feminine Expression
- World Press Photo of the Year 2004
- Google Maps Service is openinig
- New Web Site for Education Journalism
- Rumors of Military Attack

- My Photoblog is Opening
- Woman Wartime Heroics
- Quake News
- Quake News(8)
- Photos of Zarand Quake
- Eastwood's Baby scoops top Oscars
- France’s ban Sahar 1 TV
- Media hid BTK clues from public
- International Women's Day
- Best blogs on the web honoured
- Hands Off the Web...
- Media freedom: media transformation


Iranian Daily Newspaper

Professional Communications Blogs

Active Voice.Thoughts on hi-tech public relations Shel Holtz BEYOND PR Perspicacious Perspectives on PR Practices Lawrence Ragan Communications, Inc Sister Scorpion Falluja Pictures Media + Communication Voce Communications Here.Please no click.For Mass Communications, Media, Newapapers & Photojournalism


Iranian Daily Newspaper Iranian Daily Newspaper Iranian Daily Newspaper WASHINGTON POST INT HERALD TRIBUNE The only independent monthly Muslim newspaper in the UK WASHINGTON TIMES FINANCIAL TIMES CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR Waiting For Communicat with you

News Agency

News From NYT

British Blog Directory Map

Wednesday, September 21, 2005
 Why the Internet Isn't the Death of the Post Office
ILLIONS of people now rent their movies the Netflix way.
They fill out a wish list from the 50,000 titles on the company's Web site and
receive the first few DVD's in the mail; when they mail each one back, the next
one on the list is sent.

The Netflix model has been exhaustively analyzed for its disruptive, new-economy
implications. What will it mean for video stores like Blockbuster, which has, in fact,
started a similar service? What will it mean for movie studios and theaters?
What does it show about "long tail" businesses - ones that amalgamate many niche
markets, like those for Dutch movies or classic musicals, into a single large audience?

But one other major implication has barely been mentioned: what this and similar
Internet-based businesses mean for that stalwart of the old economy, the United States
Postal Service.

Every day, some two million Netflix envelopes come and go as first-class mail. They are
joined by millions of other shipments from online pharmacies, eBay vendors,
and other businesses that did not exist before the Internet.

The eclipse of "snail mail" in the age of instant electronic communication has been
predicted at least as often as the coming of the paperless office. But the consumption
of paper keeps rising. (It has roughly doubled since 1980, with less use of newsprint
and much more of ordinary office paper.) And so, with some nuances and internal
changes, does the flow of material carried by mail. On average, an American
household receives twice as many pieces of mail a day as it did in the 1970's.

"Is the Internet hurting the mails, or helping?" asks Michael J. Critelli, a co-chairman
of the public-private Mail Industry Task Force. "It's doing both." Mr. Critelli's day job
is chief executive of Pitney Bowes - yes, that Pitney Bowes, once known for its postage
meters and now a "mail and document management" company. In the last few years, it
has also functioned as a research group for the mail industry, commissioning a series of
studies, available free at, that contain startling findings about the
economic, technological and cultural forces that affect use of mail.

The harmful side of the Internet's impact is obvious but statistically less important than
many would guess. People naturally write fewer letters when they can send e-mail
To leaf through a box of old paper correspondence is to know what has been lost in this
shift: the pretty stamps, the varying look and feel of handwritten and typed correspondence, the tangible object that was once in the sender's hands. To stay in instant touch with parents, children and colleagues around the world is to know what's been gained.

But even before e-mail, personal letters had shrunk to a tiny share of the flow. As a
consultant, Fouad H. Nader, wrote in a Pitney Bowes study, personal mail had "long ago
been reduced to a minimum with the proliferation of telephone services in the last 50 years."

Personal letters of all sorts, called "household to household" correspondence, account
for less than 1 percent of the 100 billion pieces of first-class mail that the Postal Service
handles each year. Most of that personal mail consists of greeting cards, invitations, announcements and other mail with "emotional content," a category that is generally
holding its own.

The same higher-income households that rely the most on e-mail correspondence also
send and receive the most letters. Whatever shrinkage e-mail has caused in personal correspondence, it is not likely to do much more.

The Internet and allied technologies, meanwhile, are increasing the volume of
old-fashioned mail in three ways.

The first follows the Netflix example: Postal Service fulfillment of transactions made
on the Internet. About two million prescriptions a day - roughly one-fifth of the
total - are delivered by first-class mail. EBay's vendors list five million new items
daily, and those that are soldship mainly by mail. One Pitney Bowes study found that
online retailers were increasingly using paper catalogs sent through the mail to steer
people to their sites.

The second force also involves finance. Many studies conclude that people are more and more willing to make payments online, but that they strongly prefer to receive the original bills on paper, by mail.

Since the late 1980's, mail to households from credit card companies has risen about 10
percent a year. Americans' financial lives have become more complicated, in part because
of choices created by the Internet. In turn, banks, telecommunication companies, insurance companies and investment houses send more mail.

Third is the sleeper: the increasing sophistication of the Postal Service's own technology. Everyone takes for granted that FedEx and the United Parcel Service can track the
movement of each item through their systems.

The Postal Service has now installed similar scanning equipment, and in principle it can bar-code and scan every envelope or postcard and know where it is at any time. In reality, it
does this mainly for a fee, for businesses that want to know their material has reached the
right audience at the right time - for instance, the Thursday before a weekend sale at a local store.

In Internet terms, this and related improvements are intended to make advertising mail less like spam - unwanted and discarded - and more like embedded ads, tied to the content of a particular Web site.

"Over time, there is an increasing ability to send you only what's interesting to you, at a time when you're interested in it," Mr. Critelli says. If you have just moved, for example, that may mean mail from your new area's window-cleaning or handyman services. He says response rates to these targeted mailings are better than the dismal rates for the usual direct-mail campaigns.
The most touching artifact among these mail studies is a survey conducted by the Postal
Service and called "The Mail Moment."

"Two-thirds of all consumers do not expect to receive personal mail, but when they do, it
makes their day," it concluded. "This 'hope' keeps them coming back each day." Even in
this age of technology, according to the survey, 55 percent of Americans said they looked forward to discovering what each day's mail might hold.

Now I'll confess my bias. My first real job was at the post office. On the days when I was
paroled from the sorting floor to substitute for an absent letter carrier, I felt as if I was
bringing the "mail moment" to people along the route. It's nice to think that such moments
will survive the Internet.

The New York Times /By JAMES FALLOWS

 Posted in : 3:55 AM

Waiting for Communicat with you Designed by Mohsen Sanei Yarandi. Observer 2004 - 2007.© Copyright. All right reserved.